bitcoin-dev
[BIP Proposal] Buried Deployments
Original Postby Luke Dashjr
Posted on: November 17, 2016 03:06 UTC
On November 16, 2016, Peter Todd suggested an alternative solution to dealing with BIP65 in a Bitcoin-developer email chain.
The proposed solution would involve the use of a hardcoded blockhash that would allow for blocks in a chain ending with that blockhash to not follow BIP65 until that blockhash. This would be considered a softfork as rules are added that otherwise make valid chains invalid. However, Todd warns that if not implemented carefully, this could act like a hardfork. He questions whether the chain up to the block immediately before the checkpoint is valid on its own or if it only becomes retroactively valid when it hits the checkpoint.